Friday, January 30, 2009

Monday, January 26, 2009

Global Taxes and Global TV Now on the Agenda

Global Taxes and Global TV Now on the Agenda

AIM Column | By Cliff Kincaid | January 26, 2009

President Obama’s pick for Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, is being urged to lay the foundation for “global governance” by considering “international taxation” measures to loot more money from U.S. taxpayers.

For any of you readers interested in the future of America and your independence please read this article. It might enlighten you about some of the propaganda in the Media.

Just click on Global Taxes and Global TV Now on the Agenda. Follow the links in the article for verification.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Explosive Video Reich, Obamas economic advisor no "White Male Construction Workers"

Campaigner in Chief replaces Commander in Chief

In order to remove Command responsibility from "President" Obama, it has been recommended that "President" Obama issue an Executive Order changing his title and duties from "Commander in Chief" to "Campaigner in Chief."

The implication for such an Executive Order is obvious:
  1. The "President" would no longer be responsible for duties as Commander in Chief, since he has no experience in this position and can't be held responsible for it's failure because he is too important to fail.
  2. As Campaigner in Chief he can continue to carry on the duties he has demonstrated since entering public service, thereby taking full advantage of his qualifications.
  3. He would no longer be embarrassed in press conference, by having to clarify minor policy decision such as how detainees at Gitmo are going to be handled when a Campaign policy is being announced.
  4. He can continue to give press conferences with a teleprompter as he has did for those challenging rodeo attendants during his campaign that led to his appointment as Campaigner in Chief.
  5. As "President" he can continue to elevate the importance of campaigning, and not be troubled by the disrupting day to day interference of governing.
  6. It would allow him to meet his commitments to transparency because he doesn't, and wouldn't need to know, anything about the primary duty of Commander in Chief --That of protecting the United States of America. This was illustrated by his Gitmo decision and press conference yesterday.
  7. He can continue to concentrate on growing the government and promoting Socialistic ideas.
  8. He can legally add the Obama Symbol to Air Force One if it hasn't already been done.
  9. He can continue legitimately his racist defense and policies, and openly endorse Robert Reich policy's of excluding White Men and other unconstitutional policies.
  10. As Campaigner in Chief he can continue to be excluded from Constitutional requirements and can remain "President" in spite of his lack of legal birth requirements. (He hasn't provided any proof that I've seen). That's the definition of transparent that he will continue to use. Now you see it, now you don't.
  11. Don't forget money, commitments, and associations. He can continue fund raising without reporting sources. Commitments can continue to be made and selectively implemented. He can continue to appease the enemy without public scrutiny or responsibility.
After all is said and done, "He" is too important to fail in spite of the cost to America. He can continue to leave the important Commander in Chief decisions to The World Government through George Soros and his selected/appointed cabinet.

I could be wrong, but it looks like this Executive Order has already been implemented--just not announced publicly.

American Faces of Terrorist

Real Terrorist from post in September 2008.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY: HERE COMES SOCIALISM

By Dick Morris
01.21.2009

Published on TheHill.com on January 20, 2009

2009-2010 will rank with 1913-14, 1933-36, 1964-65 and 1981-82 as years that will permanently change our government, politics and lives. Just as the stars were aligned for Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson and Reagan, they are aligned for Obama. Simply put, we enter his administration as free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire America. We will shortly become like Germany, France, the United Kingdom, or Sweden — a socialist democracy in which the government dominates the economy, determines private-sector priorities and offers a vastly expanded range of services to many more people at much higher taxes.

Full Story