Who Is George Soros?—Stand Up America US

Who Is George Soros?—Stand Up America US

But what about America ? Soros told Australia ’s national newspaper “The Australian”: “America, as the centre of the globalised financial markets, was sucking up the savings of the world. This is now over. The game is out,” he said, adding that the time has come for “a very serious adjustment” in American’s consumption habits. He implied that he was the one with the power to bring this about.”

Soros: “World financial crisis was “stimulating” and “in a way, the culmination of my life’s work.”...

Back to America. Soros has been actively working to destroy America from the inside out for some years now. People have been warning us. Two years ago news sources reported that “Soros [is] an extremist who wants open borders, a one-world foreign policy, legalized drugs, euthanasia, and on and on. This is off-the-chart dangerous.”

In 1997 Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote, “Soros uses his philanthropy to change or more accurately deconstruct the moral values and attitudes of the Western world, and particularly of the American people. His “open society” is not about freedom; it is about license. His vision rejects the notion of ordered liberty, in favor of a PROGRESSIVE ideology of rights and entitlements.”

Perhaps the most important of these “whistle blowers” are David Horowitz and Richard Poe. Their book “The Shadow Party” outlines in detail how Soros hijacked the Democratic Party, and now owns it lock, stock, and barrel.

Soros has been packing the Democratic Party with radicals, and ousting moderate Democrats for years....

Some of the many NGOs (None Government Organizations) that Soros funds with his billions are: MoveOn.org, the Apollo Alliance , Media Matters for America , the Tides Foundation, the ACLU, ACORN, PDIA (Project on Death In America ), La Raza, and many more. For a more complete list, with brief descriptions of the NGOs, go to DiscoverTheNetworks.org.

Poe continues, “Through his global web of Open Society Institutes and Open Society Foundations, Soros has spent 25 years recruiting, training, indoctrinating and installing a network of loyal operatives in 50 countries, placing them in positions of influence and power in media, government, finance and academia.”

Without Soro’s money, would the Saul Alinsky’s Chicago machine still be rolling?

Would SEIU, ACORN, and La Raza still be pursuing their nefarious activities?

Would Big Money and lobbyists still be corrupting government?

Would our college campuses still be retirement homes for 1960s radicals?

This man is not only evil, but he's very very smart.
He owns the Libs and he's buying the Rino's like McCain and Graham.

Amendment #28

A History Lesson on Your Social Security Card -


Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this. It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your kids. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts!!!
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message was removed.

[9]

An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.


Information about Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary


2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program.

Now 7.65% on the first $90,000


3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year.

No longer tax deductible


4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and,

Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and SPENT!


5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Under Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month --
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away' -- you may be interested in the following:

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US .

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

note: (Here's what Truth or Fiction has to say about this one.... It is apparently false, and I've deleted what this original message claimed was truth! We are subject to so much hear-say over the internet, I'm always leary. However, I'm trusting that this information is true since it is from a "trusted" source whose aim it is to dispel fiction being passed around through e-mails.)

Social Security
As of this writing, Illegal immigrants are not benefiting much from Social Security. It's technically illegal to hire an undocumented worker so theoretically there should not be any paying into Social Security. But because of so many illegal workers who use bogus Social Security cards to get jobs, billions of dollars of Social Security deductions are made each year as well as employer payments into Social Security on behalf of those workers. Illegals are not supposed to collect on Social Security and because their Social Security numbers are manufactured, they cannot collect so the money has become a part of the controversy over Illegal immigration. There have been some estimates that more than $60 billion a year are being paid into the system because of illegal immigrants, money that would disappear if the immigrants did.

Immigration reform being debated in Congress could affect all this such as if amnesty is granted to illegal aliens currently residing in the U.S. or if illegal aliens are given some kind of participation in the Social Security system. There is no legislation, however, that would give illegal aliens Social Security payments if they have not paid into Social Security.

Social Services
Let's look at this from the standpoint of California since that is the concern of the petition and is the state with the largest population of illegal immigrants.

A wide range of services are available in California for illegal immigrants including health care and education for children.

College Tuition
At present in-state college tuition rates are available to undocumented immigrants as long as they meet other standards such as residency requirements.

------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
(back to the original e-mail....)

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.

But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to?

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.

AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!

For me, in Nov, I'm voting against any politician who does not support Constitutional Amendment #28..
Proposed 28th Amendment to the
United States Constitution:

"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States
that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives;
and,
Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives
that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States ."

Obama to visit Dallas during Texas fundraising trip | News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News | Texas Politics | The Dallas Morning News

Obama to visit Dallas during Texas fundraising trip | News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News | Texas Politics | The Dallas Morning News

The White House previously announced that Obama would travel to Texas on Aug. 9. However, detailed itineraries for such trips, which can change up to the last minute, are usually not disclosed much in advance....

The Dallas event will be held at the Highland Park home of plaintiffs' lawyer Russell Budd and his wife, Dorothy. The Budds hosted Vice President Joe Biden for a March 26 Democratic fund-raiser.

Obama is also expected to visit Austin, where he will raise money for the Democratic National Committee at the Four Seasons Hotel. While in Austin, Obama also will discuss the economy at an "official" event, a White House official said. Possibilities include a town hall or visit to a business.

Let's greet Resident Obama with a resounding Texas welcome. Let's greet him with the respect he deserves.
He has shown us that he doesn't respect the American people, or America, but continues to pass laws against the will of the people as illustrated in Arizona, ObamaCare, etc.

He has so little respect for America, that he refuses to present papers that would prove he is a legal President of the United States. You know why, he doesn't have them and is officially the Resident of the White House.

Thank him for getting out the anti Obama vote.

Obama Inauguration Donors:

Gulf Oil Spill:

Water Contamination:

Public Safety: Toyota

ObamaCare:

Occupational Injuries:

Appellate Wins:

Big Company Payments for Clients:

Dallas Housing Acquisition and Development Corporation:

The creation of the Dallas Land Bank, known as the Dallas Housing Acquisition and Development Corporation, was authorized by the Texas Urban Land Bank Demonstration Act. The Land Bank has begun to transform communities because it allows abandoned and decaying buildings to be bought through tax foreclosure and redeveloped into safe and affordable housing. These properties would otherwise sink into dangerous conditions, risks for arson and havens for crime.

It's payback time!

J.D. Hayworth 2010 | The Consistent Conservative

J.D. Hayworth 2010 | The Consistent Conservative

It is Time for McCain to go! | J.D. Hayworth 2010

It is Time for McCain to go! | J.D. Hayworth 2010

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

Justice System:

Ordinary people have also gone a long way toward losing equal treatment under law. The America described in civics books, in which no one could be convicted or fined except by a jury of his peers for having violated laws passed by elected representatives, started disappearing when the New Deal inaugurated today's administrative state -- in which bureaucrats make, enforce, and adjudicate nearly all the rules. Today's legal -- administrative texts are incomprehensibly detailed and freighted with provisions crafted exquisitely to affect equal individuals unequally. The bureaucrats do not enforce the rules themselves so much as whatever "agency policy" they choose to draw from them in any given case. If you protest any "agency policy" you will be informed that it was formulated with input from "the public." But not from the likes of you.

Disregard for the text of laws -- for the dictionary meaning of words and the intentions of those who wrote them -- in favor of the decider's discretion has permeated our ruling class from the Supreme Court to the lowest local agency. Ever since Oliver Wendell Holmes argued in 1920 (Missouri v. Holland) that presidents, Congresses, and judges could not be bound by the U.S. Constitution regarding matters that the people who wrote and ratified it could not have foreseen, it has become conventional wisdom among our ruling class that they may transcend the Constitution while pretending allegiance to it. They began by stretching such constitutional terms as "interstate commerce" and "due process," then transmuting others, e.g., "search and seizure," into "privacy." Thus in 1973 the Supreme Court endowed its invention of "privacy" with a "penumbra" that it deemed "broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." The court gave no other constitutional reasoning, period. Perfunctory to the point of mockery, this constitutional talk was to reassure the American people that the ruling class was acting within the Constitution's limitations. By the 1990s federal courts were invalidating amendments to state constitutions passed by referenda to secure the "positive rights" they invent, because these expressions of popular will were inconsistent with the constitution they themselves were construing.

By 2010 some in the ruling class felt confident enough to dispense with the charade. Asked what in the Constitution allows Congress and the president to force every American to purchase health insurance, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi replied: "Are you kidding? Are you kidding?" No surprise then that lower court judges and bureaucrats take liberties with laws, regulations, and contracts. That is why legal words that say you are in the right avail you less in today's America than being on the right side of the persons who decide what they want those words to mean.

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

Labor Unions:

Similarly, modern labor unions are ever less bunches of workers banding together and ever more bundled under the aegis of an organization chosen jointly by employers and government. Prototypical is the Service Employees International Union, which grew spectacularly by persuading managers of government agencies as well as of publicly funded private entities that placing their employees in the SEIU would relieve them of responsibility. Not by being elected by workers' secret ballots did the SEIU conquer workplace after workplace, but rather by such deals, or by the union presenting what it claims are cards from workers approving of representation. The union gets 2 percent of the workers' pay, which it recycles as contributions to the Democratic Party, which it recycles in greater power over public employees. The union's leadership is part of the ruling class's beating heart.

The point is that a doctor, a building contractor, a janitor, or a schoolteacher counts in today's America insofar as he is part of the hierarchy of a sector organization affiliated with the ruling class. Less and less do such persons count as voters.

That just about covers it all.

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

The AMA:

Thus in 2009-10 the American Medical Association (AMA) strongly supported the new medical care law, which the administration touted as having the support of "the doctors" even though the vast majority of America's 975,000 physicians opposed it. Those who run the AMA, however, have a government contract as exclusive providers of the codes by which physicians and hospitals bill the government for their services. The millions of dollars that flow thereby to the AMA's officers keep them in line, while the impracticality of doing without the billing codes tamps down rebellion in the doctor ranks. When the administration wanted to bolster its case that the state of Arizona's enforcement of federal immigration laws was offensive to Hispanics, the National Association of Chiefs of Police -- whose officials depend on the administration for their salaries -- issued a statement that the laws would endanger all Americans by raising Hispanics' animosity. This reflected conversations with the administration rather than a vote of the nation's police chiefs.

More proof of the Government control of the AMA.

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

ObamaCare:

The 2010 medical law is a template for the ruling class's economic modus operandi: the government taxes citizens to pay for medical care and requires citizens to purchase health insurance. The money thus taken and directed is money that the citizens themselves might have used to pay for medical care. In exchange for the money, the government promises to provide care through its "system." But then all the boards, commissions, guidelines, procedures, and "best practices" that constitute "the system" become the arbiters of what any citizen ends up getting. The citizen might end up dissatisfied with what "the system" offers. But when he gave up his money, he gave up the power to choose, and became dependent on all the boards and commissions that his money also pays for and that raise the cost ofcare. Similarly, in 2008 the House Ways and Means Committee began considering a plan to force citizens who own Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) to transfer those funds into government-run "guaranteed retirement accounts." If the government may force citizens to buy health insurance, by what logic can it not force them to trade private ownership and control of retirement money for a guarantee as sound as the government itself? Is it not clear that the government knows more about managing retirement income than individuals?

This is such a great article. You must read it all, not just parts.

Take Action: How They Voted on Dodd-Frank « Liberty Central

Take Action: How They Voted on Dodd-Frank « Liberty Central

You can find your Senators and Representative in the ‘Know Your Representatives’ box to the right. And you can find how they voted here for the House, and here for the Senate.