Monday, October 13, 2008

Government of Principal, or Government of Power

"My Friends," we no longer have a two party system of government of Democrat vs Republican.

We have a two party system of Government of Power vs Government of Principal. This system has been semi balanced for a number of years, but this year it is reaching the "point of no return."

Anyone that has watched the Senate live on C-Span has observed the battle of Power vs Principal. When the Democrats or Republicans are in charge of the Senate, it is defined by the media to be the party that has 50+ votes. What is overlooked is the number of Senators of either Party voting to advance their Power over those that are voting for Principal.

In the past few years the Senate has been controlled by about 60 Moderate Power Broker Senators, and 40, or less, Senators who stand firm for Principal. This makeup also controls the quality of judges appointed to the courts, including the Supreme Court.

The House is similar, except it only needs a, Majority of Power or Principal, members; and control of the Speaker Position to totally control the House.

The President has the power of leadership and the power to appointing candidates to positions, but many have to be approved by the Senate which sometimes reduces the quality. And he has the Power of the Veto.

As many of you know, in the past we have had a "Balance of Power" which means the Power Brokers don't totally control the House, the Senate, and the President all at the same time.

This election is critical beyond anything you can imagine.

Power Brokers, from both parties, are expected to gain control of all three branches of Government in this next election, independent of whether Obama or McCain is elected President, or whether Democrats or Republicans are elected to the House and Senate.

As witnessed, when Clinton or Bush was President, both had to submit legislation that the Power Brokers would support, or at least accept, to accomplish anything during their administration.

It is this emphasis in Power Broker Control over the last few years, especially since 2006, that has threatened our Government as it was structured in the Constitution. We have a more Socialistic Government, and it's power is increasing so fast that it has become obvious. Power Brokers (Socialists) may be embolden entirely by the Voter in the 2008 election.

Some of the results of Government for Power over Government of Principal are listed below:
Judicial System Making Law without Congressional restraint, including the Supreme Court.
Budgets combined.
Earmarks (bribes) continuing to grow.
Wealth redistribution plans of rebates and bailouts.
Government acquisition of Financial Institutions.
Increased spending programs, without performance review.
Immigration expansion, both legal and illegal.
Congressional effort that support our common enemy.
Increasing decisions that have to be made by courts.
Increasing court intervention in war execution.
In general, personal responsibility replaced by government control.
More power to courts.
This election, as none before, isn't about Republican or Democrat, it's about governing for Power, or for Principal.

Just for the record, I'm not happy about either McCain or Obama for President in this struggle. But there are fewer Democrats for Principal than Republicans in our current Congress and courts.

The other contributing factors affecting the election this year are Media misinformation, Voter Corruption and fraud, and Voter awareness and apathy.

As for President Bush, I believe he has tried to do what's right for the country, as he sees it, but he was terribly wrong on immigration, spending, and the Bailout legislation.

But it is just as important, if not more important, is to determine which Judges, Senators, Congressional or other officials are running for Power or Principal, independent of their listed party. However, be aware in the 2006 election, several ran as Conservatives to get elected, but were whipped into the Party Power position after elected.

With regard to Sarah Palin, I believe she is a Principal player--if Washington politics doesn't corrupt her too.

Is your vote for a Government of Principal or Power? Do you really know where the Candidate stands?

No comments: